Listening to and Learning From Each Other
On February 19th 2016 I attended the conference about promoting humane social work, at Kings College London which had been organised by the British Association of Social Workers in conjunction with the University of Bedfordshire and Making Research Count. For more details, see the BASW website.
I am very grateful to Brid Featherstone for inviting me. It was both an interesting and inspiring day. Have a look at #cpchange2016 for more tweets about the discussions and issues raised.
I hope we can continue the conversation further at the Second Child Protection Conference, organised by the Transparency Project on the 3rd June. We will be joined by many of those who spoke today – it is clear that top of the agenda must be to discuss how we can go about setting up an organisation for parent advocates; it works in Finland and it works in NYC.
Why organise this conference?
Guy Shennan, the current Chair of BASW, Brid Featherstone (Professor of Social Work at the University of Huddersfield) and Maggie Mellon (Vice Chair of BASW) opened the conference, explaining why they had organised it. Social Workers needed to find their voice as difficult conversations needed to be had.
Vision of @BASW_UK to be strong independent voice of social work; develop stronger united voice, this conference is aspect #cpchange2016
— CPResource (@C_P_Resource) February 19, 2016
What kind of society do we want? Is social work about ‘helping’ or ‘fixing’? What’s going wrong, and what can we do about it? The paradox is that we pump enormous amounts of resources into a system that doesn’t seem to be helping – in fact is often terrifying families. There is too much focus on a complex system that ‘investigates’ more than it helps.
This was one of the most popular tweets of the day from the CPR Twitter account:
We have oppressive system that purports to be about child protection – but parents and children are frightened of us #cpchange2016
— CPResource (@C_P_Resource) February 19, 2016
The views of parents
Amanda Boorman of the Open Nest charity spoke of her experiences with her adopted daughter and how she made contact with her birth family to enable her daughter to make sense of her history. She showed a short film ‘Severance’ which showed daughter and mother meeting after five years of separation; powerful, moving and very compelling watching for anyone tempted to think adoption is a panacea for all the problems of traumatised children.
We have worked together as 2 families for last 15 years. Risky, but worth taking the risk. #cpchange2016
— CPResource (@C_P_Resource) February 19, 2016
We need to think more critically about what we are trying to achieve and how we do it
.@theopennest 'While (removing the children) may still have been inevitable, the process could have been a lot kinder' #cpchange2016
— BASW (@BASW_UK) February 19, 2016
Suriviving Safeguarding spoke of her wish to set up a national scheme of parent advocates, to enable others to get the help and insight she had needed to successfully fight for her son.
She spoke powerfully of her experiences including her recognition that she had to take ownership of her own difficulties. But neither she nor her family were helped by a punitive and adversarial approach from her Local Authority. Her story is also told today by journalist Louise Tickle in the Guardian.
Working Together to Change a System
The impact of parents to act as powerful ‘countervailing force’ against a rigid bureaucracy was taken up by David Tobis, author of ‘From Pariahs to Partners: How parents and their allies changed New York City’s child welfare system’.
A sociologist, he has worked with UNICEF and other organisations to improve child protection systems around the world. For 25 years he has worked particularly with the child welfare system in NYC – in the 1990s one of the worst in the USA. By marshalling the energies of parents who worked with other allies such as lawyers and social workers, it was possible to create and sustain real and positive change; the numbers of children taken into care falling from 50,000 to about 10,000.
He was clear that none of us can do this on our own. We need to work together. Bringing parents into the process allowed them to tell their stories and be seen as humans, not monsters. This connection helped ease feelings of stigma and shame about seeking help.
Parents demonised as two dimensional monsters. Help people see who they really were. #cpchange2016
— CPResource (@C_P_Resource) February 19, 2016
The day finished with further panel discussion from Andy Bilson (Emeritus Professor of Social Work at the University of Central Lancashire), Ruth Allen (incoming CEO of BASW); Professor Sue White (of Birmingham University); Anna Gupta (Senior Lecturer in Social Work at Royal Holloway, University of London) and Marion Russell (Principal Social Worker at Cornwall County Council).
We also heard contributions from the floor from two parents whose children are in care; expressing their frustration with the process and echoing the need for change.
Cathy Ashley also spoke of the work of the Family Rights Group and the work of Your Family Your Voice Alliance, and urged people to join.
Where do we go from here?
The underlying principle of the day was probably summed up by Brid Featherstone
We need to find our collective bravery and tackle 'risk monster'. wasting money on investigatory model that terrifies people. #cpchange2016
— CPResource (@C_P_Resource) February 19, 2016
I hope we can continue this very necessary conversation, with contributions from everyone who is involved – parents, lawyers, social workers, experts, children. Not only are the Transparency Project organising an event on June 3rd, but also Your Family Your Voice Alliance will be meeting on June 22nd.
What we now need to do is put conversation into action.
Reference too to Margaret Mead; we need to be reminded more often of the truth of this.
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.