Child Protection in Finland

We are grateful for this contribution from the Lähemmäs (Closer) project from Finland.

Lähemmäs believes that the child has the right to express who s/he feels close to and the aim is to get those people involved in supporting the child in all stages of child welfare procedures.

Another aim is to challenge the authorities to see the people around the child as positive resources when they prove to be such.

See more at www.pesapuu -a nationwide child welfare association bringing expertise to the field of child welfare.


Adoption is not the solution?

We can see that the important issues and questions being considered in Finland are very similar to those in England – particularly the core value of protecting the best interests of the child and looking at family care as the first resort for children.

The key distinction between UK and Finnish law is that Finland does not permit any kind of formal end to the legal relationship between parent and child although a child has been taken into long-term care. Thus in the Finnish system, children taken into care will NOT be adopted but rather will be in foster care or institutional care.

It would be interesting to compare and contrast in greater detail the different attitudes between the Finnish and the UK approach to what is considered the best long term outcomes for children in care. 

See further The New Child Welfare Act in Finland, 2008

EDIT 9th August 2015: To say that Finland does not permit a formal end to the legal relationship between parent and child does not seem to be supported by legal analysis from others.  Please see this post by Claire Fenton Glynn. I will attempt to find out more and clarify this position.

EDIT – 9th August 2015 Claire Fenton Glynn explains the position re Finland

The Finnish Adoption Act (22/2012) reads as follows:

Section 9
(1) The adoption of a child may not be granted unless his/her parents have consented thereto, with the exceptions provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) and section 36(2).
(2) For exceptional reasons, adoption may be granted even if the consent of the parents or one of them has not been obtained or if a previous consent has been withdrawn, if it is deemed that the adoption obviously and definitely is in the best interests of the child and that the refusal or withdrawal of consent by the parent(s) is not sufficiently justified, taking into account the best interests of the child and the interaction between the child and the parent(s), their mutual relationship and its nature.
…  you are also correct that in Finland uses long term foster care as the preferred option, and I think the use of this section would be very rare (if you look at cases where Finland has been taken to the ECtHR, even in quite extreme cases foster care is preferred).

Unfortunately, I don’t know full details about how often it is used, and in what circumstances. I think this is the crucial issue, and it is why I don’t really think talking about the mechanisms for adoption in and of themselves is necessary helpful – the only reason I have been emphasising the legal frameworks is that I get annoyed that there is misinformation out there about it not being possible, when I think there needs to be a shift in the discussion – moving away from what is possible (because all frameworks are roughly similar in terms of some kind of parental misconduct or abandonment), to what is actually done.

What we need is a discussion of how these mechanisms are used, and when, and what reaction social services would have in different countries to the same scenario (eg. drug use of parents, developmental delays, problems at school etc). There was one attempt to do so in 2003 by Warman and Roberts, but as far as I am aware, nothing similar has been done since.

Main issues and questions in child protection at the moment in Finland

  • How is the information shared between various authorities?
  • Family care as primary option for the children in care.
  • The amount of work and customers per social worker ( e.g. the prime assessments of whether there is a need for child protective services are not always done in the timeline stated in the Child Welfare Act).
  • The need for a strategy plan for improving child welfare.
  • The experiences of the children, the young and the families who are/have been clients in child welfare services will be taken into account when assessing and improving the quality of child protection services.


Child welfare in Finland

Basic principles and procedures and what is going on


Growth in the number of children in care has stagnated

  • In 2012, the number of children placed in care, total of 10,675, stayed at the same level as the year before. The number of new cases of taking into care fell by 143 children, showing a decrease of 4 per cent on 2011.
  • The number of children in emergency placement has been increasing sharply since 2005, but now the growth has slowed down. There were 3,944 children in emergency placement in 2012, showing an increase of 1.5 per cent on 2011.
  • During the year, a total of 17,830 children and young people were placed outside the home, an increase of 1.6 per cent on the previous year. There were more boys placed outside the home than girls.
  • Half of the children in care at the end of 2012 were placed in foster families. Of these children, 11 per cent were placed with relatives or friends.
  • There were 1.6 child welfare notifications per child in 2012, and the notifications concerned altogether 64,391 children.
  • Around 87,200 children and young people received support in community care in 2011. This was 7 per cent more than in 2010. Some 7 000 clients in community care received after-care.
Source: Child welfare 2012. THL.


Main principles of child welfare in Finland (Child Welfare Act: Chapter 1, Section 4)

  • to promote the child’s development and well-being
  • to support parents and other custodians in the child’s upbringing and care
  • to prevent problems and intervene when necessary

The centre of the focus is the child and the following points have to be ensured when considering various possibilities and decisions in child welfare:

  • a balanced development and wellbeing along with close and permanent relationships
  • an opportunity to get affection and understanding along with care and supervisionaccording to child’s age and level of maturity
  • an education consistent with the abilities and wishes of a child
  • a safe environment for growing up and the right for physical and mental integrity
  • a sense of responsibility in growing up and becoming independent
  • an opportunity to be involved and influence their own issues
  • the linguistic, cultural and religious background must be taken into account

Actions should be as discreet as possible and the open care services must be used as primary means of help unless the need of a child requires otherwise. When substitute care is in the best interest of a child it must be arranged without delay. The aim to re-unite the family must be taken into account in substitute care while keeping the best interest of a child in mind.

Child protection in practice – the procedures in child welfare in Finland

Source: Central Union of Child welfare

The services that aim to prevent problems

Some of them are available to all citizens and others are available when needed. For example:

  • prenatal care for all citizens
  • regular health and developmental check-ups for all children under seven for all citizens
  • day care and preschool services for all citizens
  • child guidance and family counselling services when needed
  • pupil welfare when needed
  • youth work when needed
  • family counselling clinics when needed
  • peer support groups when needed
  • home help services and working with families when they need help and support
  • family conciliation when needed


Child welfare notification if you are concerned about a child ́s well-being

  • who: anyone, the parent, the child, police, school, neighbour basically anyone who is concerned about a child but authorities working with children are obliged to report a concern about a child
  • where: the municipal office of social services
  • what happens: social workers have a duty to investigate every report
  • no measures are taken before the investigation unless the child is in immediate danger
  • sometimes the report is a mistake and the case is closed
  • if the child and the family need help, a client plan is made

The basic principle is to help the child and the family so that the children could live in their own homes with their families. These primary services are called support means in open care. They are voluntary and based on co-operation.

They can be for example:

  • family help at home
  • support person or support family for the child
  • financial aid for for example to help with hobby costs
  • peer group activities
  • therapy services
  • placement of the whole family in family or institutional care
  • holiday and recreational activities


Taking into Care

Sometimes parents are unable to take care of their child for one reason or another. Sometimes a child does something harmful to him/herself. If the problems are so severe that a child is not safe at home or the harm done by themselves is too risky and there is no other way to improve the situation, the only solution is to arrange the care away from home. Children must be taken into care and substitute care must be provided for them by the officials responsible for social services if:

  • their health or development in seriously endangered by lack of care or other circumstances in which they are being brought up
  • they seriously endanger their health or development by use of intoxicants, by committing an illegal act other than a minor offence or by any other comparable behaviour

Taking a child into care and substitute care may be resorted to if

  • the open care services would not be suitable or possible or have proved to be insufficient
  •  substitute care is estimated to be in the best interest of a child


Substitute care

  • as family care (a foster family)
  • a professional family home
  • institutional care

The placement away from home may be a short-term solution to a difficult situation. Emergency placement is implemented if a child is in danger. Taking into care is the final option. Taking into care is prepared together with the family and may take a long time. Sometimes taking into care must be done even though the family opposes it. A child taken into care goes to live in a foster family or child protection institution. The child stays in care as long as it is needed but if the circumstances that led to placement away from home change for the better it is necessary to find out whether the child could return home.

After care

  • those who are taken into care have a right to after care if the placement has lasted more than six months
  • the purpose is to help the child to return home or a young person to become independent
  • it may include support for housing, livelihood, work or studies.


More information

Survivors Group in Pesäpuu

The Survivors’ focus group consists of young volunteers between the ages of 16-26 who are or have been in alternative care. The group was formed in 2008 as part of the Youth in Alternative Care project under the auspices of the Finnish NGO Pesäpuu – Centre of Expertise in Child Welfare which is financed by the Finnish Slot Machine Organisation (RAY).

See ‘Protect your Dreams – Safeguard the Hope: Children’s Contribution to Developing High Quality Alternative Care’ – the Ombudsman for Children in Finland.


We Believe in You, So Should You

The first handbook for children and youth in alternative care in Scandinavia was published in 2010 by the Selviytyjät Survivors Focus and Development Group. The title ‘We Believe in You, So Should You’ served as a basis to a seminar. From this the group developed a special tool to help others develop methods to better hear the needs of children.

There is more information about the guide here


About Family Policy in Finland

See Child and Family Policy in Finland  – the aim of Finland’s family policy is to create a safe environment for children to grow up in and to provide parents with the material and psychological means to have and raise children. In recent years, the emphasis has been on reconciling paid employment and family life, strengthening fatherhood and ensuring an adequate level of income for families. 


About Inter- Country Adoption Affairs

The  Finnish Board of Inter-Country Adoption Affairs  (Finnish Adoption Board) is the expert body in inter-country adoption affairs in Finland. It is subordinated to the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. The Board was founded in 1985 and has since 1 July 1997 acted as the central authority meant in the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Convention). This is what we understand by adoption in Finland.

See also the Association of Adoptive Families in Finland.


The Nordic perspective on child welfare.

See Social Welfare and Child Welfare politics through Nordic lenses


Children and families are at the heart of social work all over the world, but, until now Nordic perspectives have been rare in the body of English-language child welfare literature. Is there something that makes child welfare ideas and practices that are in use in the Nordic countries characteristically ‘Nordic’? If so, what kinds of challenges do the current globalization trends pose for Nordic child welfare practices, especially for social work with children and families?

Covering a broad range of child welfare issues, this edited collection provides examples of Nordic approaches to child welfare, looking at differences between Nordic states as well as the similarities. It considers, and critically examines, the particular features of the Nordic welfare model – including universal social care services that are available to all citizens and family policies that promote equality and individuality – as a resource for social work with children and families.

Drawing on contemporary research and debates from different Nordic countries, the book examines how social work and child welfare politics are produced and challenged as both global and local ideas and practices. “Social work and child welfare politics” is aimed at academics and researchers in social work, childhood studies, children’s policy and social policy, as well as social work practitioners, policy makers and service providers, all over the world who are interested in Nordic experiences of providing care and welfare for families with children.



7 thoughts on “Child Protection in Finland

  1. Eeyore Incognito

    It would be interesting to know what the main evidence against adoption in Finland relates to – clearly the evidence here is better for adoption in many cases. Is this because “Care” in Finland is better resourced?

    Are foster carers better supported and resourced? Are their more long term foster carers available and if so is there an indication why?

    Institutional care here is unquestionably the last resort, and few do well out of it. What are the main differences between institutions there and here?

  2. Sarah Phillimore

    I would also be interested to know more, and I hope the authors will be responding at some point – I know they are keen to have discussion about the different approaches in our respective countries.

  3. Andrew Judd

    I am in Finland. My youngest child born was born with Down syndrome and has had the same foster mother since 3 weeks old.

    At the birth hospital a nurse spoke to us in some detail about her own Down child and also said that for ten years a husband had not said anything about their ‘new situation’. Thats the Finnish way. Suffer in silence. The two nurses on duty when we left with our by now clearly diagnosed Down child congratulated us. Not one single person told us there was help available if we wanted it. We only found out there was help available when my wife contacted an adoption agency whereupon we were asked to visit social services.

    1. Sarah Phillimore Post author

      I am sorry to hear you did not get help when you needed it, but I am glad to hear that your child has a secure placement.

  4. Pingback: How you do anything is how you do everything – the view from Finland #Nordic2015 | Child Protection Resource

  5. Pingback: Promoting Humane Social Work With Families | Child Protection Resource

Comments are closed.